|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Experiencing modernization: Frontline probation perspectives on the transition to a National Offender Management Service
Gwen Robinson
University of Sheffield, G.J.Robinson{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Ros Burnett
University of Oxford, ros.burnett{at}crim.ox.ac.uk
The National Offender Management Service (NOMS), intended to integrate the Probation and Prison Services of England and Wales and to provide an operational framework for the end-to-end management of offenders throughout their sentences, was introduced in summer 2004. This major innovation came fast after a period of immense change to probation services which had culminated in the formation of the National Probation Service (NPS) in 2001. The present study, in which 41 probation practitioners from four probation areas were interviewed, sought to gain insight into frontline perspectives on the impact of NOMS. The study indicates that communication to frontline staff about NOMS has not been wholly effective and many practitioners are experiencing `initiative confusion' and `change fatigue' in endeavouring to meet an increasing range of demands from an expanding range of `masters'. While many remain open to the possible benefits of NOMS, particularly for offenders, considerable uncertainty remains about the implications of NOMS for themselves and the Probation Service. The `ogre of contestability' is linked with fears about future job security, whilst other aspects of the NOMS agenda are adding to a sense of demoralization and increasing alienation from the values that brought some into the service.
Key Words: contestability • NOMS • offender management • practitioners • probation
References
- Allen, R. and M. Hough (2006) `Endnote' in M. Hough, R. Allen and U. Padel, (eds) Reshaping Probation and Prisons: The New Offender Management Framework, pp. 95—102. London: The Policy Press.
- Bhui, H.S. (2005) `Effective Probation Practice and NOMS' (Editorial), Probation Journal 52(3): 219—20.[CrossRef]
- Burnett, R. and F. McNeill (2005) `The Place of the Officer—Offender Relationship in Assisting Offenders to Desist from Crime', Probation Journal 52(3): 221—42.[Abstract]
- Carter, P. (2003) Managing Offenders, Reducing Crime (The Carter Review). London: Home Office.
- CEP and NPS ( 2004) Management of Evidence-Based Practice in Probation: Proceedings of a Conference Held by Conférence Permanente Européenne de la Probation and the NPS for England and Wales, Oxford, 3—5 March 2004.
- Clarke, C. (2005) Where Next for Penal Policy? Speech to the Prison Reform Trust, 19 September 2005.
- Clarke, J., S. Gewirtz and E. McLaughlin (2000) New Managerialism, New Welfare? London: Sage.
- Drakeford, M. (1993) `But Who Will Do the Work?', Critical Social Policy 13(2): 64—76.[Free Full Text]
- Halliday Report (2001) Making Punishments Work: Report of a Review of the Sentencing Framework. London: Home Office.
- HM Inspectorate of Probation (2005) 2004/2005 Annual Report. London: Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Probation.
- HM Inspectorates of Prisons and Probation ( 2001) Through the Prison Gate: A Joint Thematic Review by HM Inspectorates of Prisons and Probation. London: Home Office.
- Home Office (1984) Probation Service in England and Wales: Statement of National Objectives and Priorities. London: Home Office.
- Home Office (1998) Joining Forces to Protect the Public: Prisons—Probation. London: Home Office.
- Home Office (2002) Justice for All. Cm. 5563. London: TSO.
- Home Office (2004) Reducing Crime — Changing Lives: The Government's Plans for Transforming the Management of Offenders. London: Home Office.
- Hough, M., R. Allen and U. Padel (eds) ( 2006) Reshaping Probation and Prisons: The New Offender Management Framework. London: The Policy Press.
- Knott, C. (2004) `Evidence-based Practice in the National Probation Service' in R. Burnett and C. Roberts (eds) What Works in Probation and Youth Justice: Developing Evidence-Based Practice, pp. 14—28. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
- McGuire, J. (2002) `Motivation for What? Effective Programmes for Motivated Offenders', in M. McMurran (ed.) Motivating Offenders to Change: A Guide to Enhancing Engagement in Therapy, pp. 157—72. Chichester: Wiley.
- McKnight, J. (2005) Address to the 2005 Napo Annual Conference, Llandudno, 14—16 October 2005.
- McKnight, J. (2006) `Come Back Jack!' Napo News, October, Issue 183. URL (consulted October 2006): http://www.napo2.org.uk
- McNeill, F., S. Batchelor, R. Burnett and J. Knox (2005) 21st Century Social Work: Reducing Reoffending: Key Skills. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
- Mair, G. (1997) `Community Penalties and the Probation Service ', in M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 2nd Edition, pp. 1195—232. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Mair, G., L. Burke and S. Taylor (2006) `"The Worst Tax Form You've Ever Seen?" Probation Officers' Views about OASys', Probation Journal 53(1): 7—23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Napo (2005) Restructuring Probation — What Works? Napo's Response to the Home Office Consultation Paper `Restructuring Probation to Reduce Re-offending'. London: Napo.
- National Audit Office (2006) The Management of Staff Sickness in the Probation Service. London: The Stationery Office.
- Nellis, M. (2004) `"Into the Field of Corrections": The End of English Probation in the Early 21st Century', The Cambrian Law Review, 35: 115—33.
- NOMS (2005) Restructuring Probation to Reduce Re-Offending. London: Home Office.
- NOMS (2006a) The NOMS Offender Management Model, Version 1.1. URL (consulted October 2006): http://noms.justice.gov.uk/news-publicationsevents/publications/strategy/offender-management-model-1.1?view=Binary
- NOMS (2006b) Improving Prison and Probation Services: Public Value Partnerships. URL (consulted October 2006): http://noms.justice.gov.uk/news-publicationsevents/publications/strategy/impr_prison_probat_partnerships?view=Binary
- NPS (2006) Workforce Information Report (Issue 11, July 2006). URL (consulted October 2006): http://www.probation.homeoffice.gov.uk/files/pdf/Workforce%20Information%20Report%209.pdf
- PA Consultancy Group and MORI (2005) Action Research Study of the Implementation of the National Offender Management Model in the North West Pathfinder. Home Office Online Report 32/05. London: Home Office.
- Raine, J.W. and M.J. Willson (1996), `Managerialism and Beyond: The Case of Criminal Justice', International Journal of Public Sector Management 9(4): 20—33.[CrossRef]
- Raynor, P. and M. Maguire (2006) `End-to-end or End in Tears? Prospects for the Effectiveness of the National Offender Management Model', in M. Hough, R. Allen and U. Padel (eds) ( 2006) Reshaping Probation and Prisons: The New Offender Management Framework, pp. 21—34. London: The Policy Press.
- Raynor, P. and M. Vanstone (2007) `Towards a Correctional Service', in L. Gelsthorpe and R. Morgan (eds) The Willan Handbook of Probation. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
- Robinson, G. (2003) `Technicality and Indeterminacy in Probation Practice: A Case Study', British Journal of Social Work 33(5): 593—610.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Robinson, G. (2005) `What Works in Offender Management?', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 44(3): 307—18.[CrossRef]
- Rumgay, J. (2005) `Counterblast: NOMS Bombs?', Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 44(2): 206—8.[CrossRef]
- Social Exclusion Unit (2002) Reducing Re-offending by Ex-prisoners. London: Social Exclusion Unit.
- Wallis, E. (2001) A New Choreography: An Integrated Strategy for the National Probation Service for England and Wales. London: Home Office.
- Wargent, M. (2005) `Accountability and Contestability: Justice at Any Price', Vista 10(1): 37—42.
Probation Journal, Vol. 54, No. 4,
318-337 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0264550507083534
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
J. Annison, T. Eadie, and C. Knight
People First: Probation Officer Perspectives on Probation Work
Probation Journal,
September 1, 2008;
55(3):
259 - 271.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
