Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Probation Journal
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ansbro, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

What can we learn from Serious Incident Reports?

Maria Ansbro

University of Hertfordshire, m.j.ansbro{at}herts.ac.uk

This article discusses an examination of 90 Serious Incident Reports (SIRs) generated in the London Probation Area between January 2002 and July 2003. The results showed that offenders assessed as high risk generated a disproportionately high number of SIRs, but equally serious incidents occurred across all risk bands. Consequently, while probation staff were proficient in identifying those most likely to inflict harm, the analysis demonstrates the limitations of risk prediction, and the need for considerable skill and knowledge among staff who work with offenders of all risk bands. Another significant finding was that whereas past violent behaviour was a powerful predictor of future violence, relatively few of those accused of a sexual offence had previous sexual convictions.

Key Words: criminogenic factors • prediction • risk • risk principle • Serious Incident Report

References

  • Appelbaum, P. (2000) Delusions Do Not Increase Risk of Violence . Presentation to Royal College of Psychiatrists Annual Conference, 3-7 July, London.
  • Beaumont, B. ‘Risk Assessment and Prediction Research’, and ‘Assessing Risk from Offenders’, in Parsloe, P. (ed.) (1999) Risk Assessment in Social Care and Social Work. London: Jessica Kingsley
  • Blumenthal, S. & Lavender, T. (2000) Violence and Mental Disorder: A Critical Aid to the Assessment and Management of Risk. London: Zito Trust .
  • Chapman, T. & Hough, M. (1998) Evidence Based Practice: A Guide to Effective Practice. London: HMIP .
  • Craissati, J. (2004) Managing High Risk Sex Offenders in the Community - A Psychological Approach. London: Brunner-Routledge .
  • Department of Health (1999) Framework For Mental Health. London: Department of Health .
  • Farrington, D.P. (1995) ‘Human Development and Criminal Careers’, in Maguire, M., Morgan, R. and Reiner, R. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
  • Feeley, M. & Simon, J. (1992) ‘The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications’ , in Criminology 30: 43-66 .
  • Furedi, F. (2001) Paranoid Parenting: Abandon Your Anxieties and Be A Good Parent. London: Allen Lane/Penguin Press .
  • Harper, G. & Chitty, C. (2005) The Impact of Corrections on Re-Offending: A Review of ‘What Works’ (2nd Edition). Home Office Research Study 291, Research Development and Statistics Directorate. London: Home Office .
  • Home Office (1995) Incident Reporting. Probation Circular No. 41/1995. London: Home Office .
  • Home Office (2003) Notification, Screening and Review System for Serious Further Offences Committed by Supervised Offenders. Probation Circular 54/2003. London: Home Office .
  • Kelly, L., Lovell, J. & Regan, L. (2005) A Gap or a Chasm? Attrition Rates in Reported Rape Cases. Home Office Research Study 293. London: Home Office .
  • Kemshall, H. & Pritchard, J. (eds) (1995) Good Practice in Risk Assessment and Risk Management. London: Jessica Kingsley .
  • Kemshall, H. (2003) Understanding Risk in Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
  • Link, B.G. & Stueve, A. (1994) ‘Psychotic Symptoms and the Violent/Illegal Behaviour of Mental Patients Compared to Community Controls’, in Monahan, J. and Steadman, H. (eds) Violence and Mental Disorder. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
  • McGuire, J. (1995) What Works: Reducing Reoffending. Chichester: Wiley .
  • Metropolitan Police (2004) Getting Away With It. London: Metropolitan Police .
  • Mirlees-Black, C. (1999) British Crime Survey - 1996 Domestic Violence Findings. London: Home Office .
  • Munro, E. (1999) ‘Protecting Children in an Anxious Society’ , in Health Risk and Society 1 (1): 117-128 .
  • Munro, E. & Rumgay, J. (2000) ‘The Role of Risk Assessment in Reducing Homicides by People With Mental Illness’ , in British Journal of Psychiatry 176: 116-120 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • National Offender Management Service (2005) The NOMS Offender Management Model (Version 1). London: NOMS .
  • National Statistics Office (2005) Social Trends 34: URL (accessed May 2005): www.statistics.gov.uk/STATBASE/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=7345 URL
  • Rhys, M. (2001) Survey of Reports to the Home Office of Serious Incident Reports in Inner London Probation Service 1995-2000. Unpublished, but available at the London Probation Area Library .
  • Rice, M.E. & Harris, G.T. (1995) ‘Predicting Sexual Offences’, in Campbell, J. (ed.) Assessing Dangerousness: Violence by Sexual Offenders, Batterers and Child Abusers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications .
  • Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health (2002) Report on Hackney’s Mental Health Services. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health .
  • Scotland, P. (2005) MAPPA, Protecting the Public in Partnership: London MAPPA. London: Metropolitan Police .
  • Taylor, P. & Gunn, J. (1999) ‘Mental Disorder and Risk of Violence’ , International Review of Psychiatry 174: 9-14 .
  • Taylor, R. (1999) Predicting Reconvictions for Sexual and Violent Offenders Using the Revised Offender Group Reconviction Scale. Research Findings No 104 Home Office Research and Statistics Directorate. London: Home Office .

Probation Journal, Vol. 53, No. 1, 57-70 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0264550506060869


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ansbro, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?