This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Robinson, G. Articles by Burnett, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Experiencing modernization: Frontline probation perspectives on the transition to a National Offender Management Service

University of Sheffield, G.J.Robinson{at}sheffield.ac.uk

Ros Burnett

University of Oxford, ros.burnett{at}crim.ox.ac.uk

The National Offender Management Service (NOMS), intended to integrate the Probation and Prison Services of England and Wales and to provide an operational framework for the end-to-end management of offenders throughout their sentences, was introduced in summer 2004. This major innovation came fast after a period of immense change to probation services which had culminated in the formation of the National Probation Service (NPS) in 2001. The present study, in which 41 probation practitioners from four probation areas were interviewed, sought to gain insight into frontline perspectives on the impact of NOMS. The study indicates that communication to frontline staff about NOMS has not been wholly effective and many practitioners are experiencing `initiative confusion' and `change fatigue' in endeavouring to meet an increasing range of demands from an expanding range of `masters'. While many remain open to the possible benefits of NOMS, particularly for offenders, considerable uncertainty remains about the implications of NOMS for themselves and the Probation Service. The `ogre of contestability' is linked with fears about future job security, whilst other aspects of the NOMS agenda are adding to a sense of demoralization and increasing alienation from the values that brought some into the service.

Key Words: contestability • NOMS • offender management • practitioners • probation

Probation Journal, Vol. 54, No. 4, 318-337 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0264550507083534


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Annison, T. Eadie, and C. Knight People First: Probation Officer Perspectives on Probation Work Probation Journal, September 1, 2008; 55(3): 259 - 271. [Abstract] [PDF]