Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Probation Journal
This Article
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mair, G.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘The worst tax form you’ve ever seen’? Probation officers’ views about OASys

George Mair

Liverpool John Moores University, g.mair{at}ljmu.ac.uk

Lol Burke

Liverpool John Moores University, l.burke{at}ljmu.ac.uk

Stuart Taylor

Liverpool John Moores University, s.taylor{at}ljmu.ac.uk

Classification with regard to their risk/needs has become an increasingly significant aspect of work with offenders generally. In England and Wales, the Offender Assessment System (OASys) used by the National Probation Service has a key role to play in effective practice. OASys is the latest in a series of such assessment tools, but despite considerable care taken over its development, users’ views about its efficacy have not been explored. This article reports the results of the first national survey of Probation Officers’ views about OASys. While a variety of concerns are noted - especially the time-consuming nature of completing an OASys assessment - and such concerns need to be addressed, on the whole, users are not opposed to OASys.

Key Words: National Probation Service • OASys • risk assessment

Probation Journal, Vol. 53, No. 1, 7-23 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0264550506060861


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
J. Annison, T. Eadie, and C. Knight
People First: Probation Officer Perspectives on Probation Work
Probation Journal, September 1, 2008; 55(3): 259 - 271.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
D. Wendy Fitzgibbon
Fit for purpose? OASys assessments and parole decisions
Probation Journal, March 1, 2008; 55(1): 55 - 69.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
G. Robinson and R. Burnett
Experiencing modernization: Frontline probation perspectives on the transition to a National Offender Management Service
Probation Journal, December 1, 2007; 54(4): 318 - 337.
[Abstract] [PDF]