Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Probation Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchanan, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Missing links? Problem drug use and social exclusion

Julian Buchanan

University of Wales

In the late 1980s illicit drug use became a major social problem in the UK. Since then policy and practice has largely been shaped by psychological and medical perspectives that emphasize the physiological and psychological nature of dependence. Concerned by the limited impact in reducing the number of problem drug users, in 2000 the government shifted the emphasis away from voluntary treatment by the health and voluntary sector, towards coercive treatment, initially in the form of a Drug Treatment and Testing Order (DTTO). The Criminal Justice Interventions Programme (CJIP), a £447 million programme to ‘direct drug misusing offenders out of crime and into treatment’ (Home Office, 2004a: 29) further illustrates and reinforces this shift. This article argues that this shift in approach is also likely to founder, as it continues to be dominated by a narrow focus individuals and their drug dependence, and fails to adequately address the social context, nature and underlying causes of problem drug use.

Key Words: addiction • CJIP • crime • drugs • social exclusion • treatment

Probation Journal, Vol. 51, No. 4, 387-397 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0264550504048246


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
S. Taylor
Outside the outsiders: Media representations of drug use
Probation Journal, December 1, 2008; 55(4): 369 - 387.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
M. Hollingworth
An examination of the potential impact of the Drug Rehabilitation Requirement on homeless illicit drug-using offenders
Probation Journal, June 1, 2008; 55(2): 127 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
P. Boland
British drugs policy: Problematizing the distinction between legal and illegal drugs and the definition of the `drugs problem'
Probation Journal, June 1, 2008; 55(2): 171 - 187.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
European Journal of CriminologyHome page
A. Stevens, D. Berto, U. Frick, V. Kerschl, T. McSweeney, S. Schaaf, M. Tartari, P. Turnbull, B. Trinkl, A. Uchtenhagen, et al.
The Victimization of Dependent Drug Users: Findings from a European Study, UK
European Journal of Criminology, October 1, 2007; 4(4): 385 - 408.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br J CriminolHome page
T. Seddon
Drugs, Crime and Social Exclusion: Social Context and Social Theory in British Drugs-Crime Research
Br. J. Criminol., July 1, 2006; 46(4): 680 - 703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]