|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Supporting Desistance in Probation Practice: A Response to Maruna, Porter and Carvalho
Fergus McNeill
University of Glasgow
The author argues that a major challenge of Maruna, Porter and Carvalhos paper and other work detailing similar research, lies not only in its questioning of how probation work should be undertaken, but also of how it should actually be conceived. In particular, he considers that this body of work undermines the correctionalist paradigm which often dominates current interpretations of effective practice.
Key Words: correctionalism desistance effective practice probation programmes
Probation Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3,
241-247 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0264550504046746

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Healy and I. O'Donnell
Calling time on crime: Motivation, generativity and agency in Irish probationers
Probation Journal,
March 1, 2008;
55(1):
25 - 38.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. W. M. Fitzgibbon
Risk analysis and the new practitioner: Myth or reality?
Punishment Society,
January 1, 2007;
9(1):
87 - 97.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Smith
Making sense of psychoanalysis in criminological theory and probation practice
Probation Journal,
December 1, 2006;
53(4):
361 - 376.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. McNeill
A desistance paradigm for offender management
JCriminology and Criminal Justice,
February 1, 2006;
6(1):
39 - 62.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Gray
Book Review: After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration
Theoretical Criminology,
November 1, 2005;
9(4):
507 - 511.
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Burnett and F. McNeill
The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime
Probation Journal,
September 1, 2005;
52(3):
221 - 242.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|