Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Probation Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McNeill, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Supporting Desistance in Probation Practice: A Response to Maruna, Porter and Carvalho

Fergus McNeill

University of Glasgow

The author argues that a major challenge of Maruna, Porter and Carvalho’s paper and other work detailing similar research, lies not only in its questioning of how probation work should be undertaken, but also of how it should actually be conceived. In particular, he considers that this body of work undermines the correctionalist paradigm which often dominates current interpretations of effective practice.

Key Words: correctionalism • desistance • effective practice • probation • programmes

Probation Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3, 241-247 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0264550504046746


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
D. Healy and I. O'Donnell
Calling time on crime: Motivation, generativity and agency in Irish probationers
Probation Journal, March 1, 2008; 55(1): 25 - 38.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Punishment SocietyHome page
D. W. M. Fitzgibbon
Risk analysis and the new practitioner: Myth or reality?
Punishment Society, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 87 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
D. Smith
Making sense of psychoanalysis in criminological theory and probation practice
Probation Journal, December 1, 2006; 53(4): 361 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal JusticeHome page
F. McNeill
A desistance paradigm for offender management
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2006; 6(1): 39 - 62.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Theoretical CriminologyHome page
P. Gray
Book Review: After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration
Theoretical Criminology, November 1, 2005; 9(4): 507 - 511.
[PDF]


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
R. Burnett and F. McNeill
The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime
Probation Journal, September 1, 2005; 52(3): 221 - 242.
[Abstract] [PDF]