This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Court, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Applying the Findings of the Liverpool Desistance Study in Probation Practice: Views from the Front-Line 2

London Probation Area

In this second response to Maruna et al’s work, the author draws comparisons with Farrall’s (2003) research, and focuses in particular on the implications of both studies for assessment, report writing and effective case management.

Key Words: case management • desistance • employment • motivation • probation intervention • strengths-based

Probation Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3, 237-240 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0264550504046745


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Healy and I. O'Donnell Calling time on crime: Motivation, generativity and agency in Irish probationers Probation Journal, March 1, 2008; 55(1): 25 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Burnett and F. McNeill The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime Probation Journal, September 1, 2005; 52(3): 221 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]