This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cluley, E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Applying the Findings of the Liverpool Desistance Study in Probation Practice: Views from the Front-Line 1

London Probation Area

The author argues that the previous article underestimates the degree to which probation practice already promotes strengths-based work with offenders and gives inadequate attention to the needs of victims in an otherwise appropriate critique of risk-focused discourse. She also highlights the work being done in her probation area to engage with communities.

Key Words: assessment • desistance • diversity • probation • risk • strengths-based

Probation Journal, Vol. 51, No. 3, 233-236 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0264550504046744


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Burnett and F. McNeill The place of the officer-offender relationship in assisting offenders to desist from crime Probation Journal, September 1, 2005; 52(3): 221 - 242. [Abstract] [PDF]