Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Probation Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Talking Quality, Meaning McDonalds, the Market and the Probation Service

Mark Oldfield, Research Officer with Kent Probation Service, discusses how the increasing use of market based concepts and approaches by Probation Service managers combined with the move toward a national computerised information system signals a drastic phase of re-organisation for the work of the Probation Service. He argues that the move toward a high-tech, finance-led Probation Service with its associated expansion of data gathering, although apparently resonant with information driven innovations in the private sector, represents a method of management concerned more with the maintenance of bureaucratic and hierarchical control and that such control threatens professional work within the Service, with fragmentation and de-skilling as the removal of discretion becomes a necessary part of the delivery of a standardised probation 'product'.

Probation Journal, Vol. 41, No. 4, 186-192 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026455059404100401


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Offender Ther Comp CriminolHome page
L. F. Alarid and C. S. Schloss
Attorney Views on the Use of Private Agencies for Probation Supervision and Treatment
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol, June 1, 2009; 53(3): 278 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Administration & SocietyHome page
E. Finkelstein
From Caseworker to Manager: Symbolic Change in a Welfare Bureaucracy
Administration Society, July 1, 2003; 35(3): 251 - 278.
[Abstract] [PDF]